My Drawing:
Sorry, I couldn't flip it to landscape!
Introduction
Artist: Agustina Woodgate
Title: The Times Atlas of the World (Book)
Date: 2012
Medium: Sanded World Atlas
Size: 515 pages; Large book
Stylistic period/culture/context
When: 2012
Where: Argentina
Subject/Iconography
A World Atlas with borders sanded out is represented in this
work; the idea/concept is that even though we as humans tend to create borders
and separate ourselves from one another, in the grand scheme of things, the
world does not actually have real lines that define "borders."
Borders are just concepts formulated by humans that allow us to "own"
land and "property."
Style/technique
The artist used sandpaper in order to "scrub" away
the borders in between states and countries. The art is arranged as is; there
is nothing else to draw your attention other than the art itself. As you flip
through the pages you can feel the smooth texture of the paper in comparison to
the other parts of the paper that weren't sanded down; paper itself seems
smooth until you compare it with something softer and easier to tear. This, in
and of itself, may be a metaphor of how the world was softer and gentler before
borders - before it became rough and harsh. But, we can't tell it's rough and
harsh because we haven't experienced it when it was smooth and gentle.
Significance/function/purpose
The purpose of this piece is to show how the world would
look if there were no borders. When drawing this picture, I realised how vast
our world is; it tends to get lost in the all the sections and bordering.
Drawing blobs of land made me feel more connected to the other blobs of land in
the world (oops, we can't have that, now can we? We might start thinking of
people in third world countries as our equals). I never left the state of North
Carolina until I was about 10 years old. When I was younger, I never doubted
that if I did cross a border into, say, Virginia, there would be a big bold line
right where the border was. To my disappointment, there was merely a sign that
read, "Welcome to Virginia!" and that was all. I believe that at a
young age we are taught that there are borders not only between states and
countries ideologically, but mental borders, as well, between each other. There
are borders between races, gender, and sexual orientation; if one tries to
cross such borders or speak to someone outside of their border, then there are
rules and regulations in place, just as there are rules and regulations that I
must follow if I cross the border from America to Canada. And, just because I
might be ignorant to the laws in place, that doesn't give me a free pass; I
will be punished just the same for whatever actions of which I partake. The
main idea is that we as humans feel the need to set up these completely
platonic borders in order to ensure that everyone has a place and to ensure
that everyone stays in their place. The value of this piece of art in today's
society is that it is a metaphor of the borders between different
"classes" of people as well as showing that borders can easily be
scrubbed away over time.
Thoughts about the curation? Also- what would happen if the art were reduced in size, color, or orientation?
ReplyDelete